Difficulties with Educational Ease
In this post, Dr Jonathan Firth and PhD student Gebing Wang reflect on a recent research seminar at 欧美高清 which explored why difficulty may not always be an obstacle to learning, but can prove a condition for depth, transformation, and engagement.
Any pedagogical process involves certain adjustments on the part of educators to support learning. Often, these make matters easier for the learner, with accommodations such as slowing down or simplifying explanations, scaffolding, or the provision of examples. Educators often view rapid, errorless progress as a hallmark of success (Metcalfe, 2017).
Representation of content through a degree of selection and simplification of the available materials and activities is termed pedagogical reduction (Lewin, 2018), and is an inevitable feature of education. This can be seen in examples ranging from the simplified language parents use with children to science books provided in high schools.
However, simplification may at times conflict with the value of challenges and depth in education. For example, Biesta (2001) argues that rather than viewing difficulty as interfering with successful learning, we should conceive of it “as something proper, that belongs to education, as something that makes education possible in the first place” (p. 386). Psychologists such as Bjork (2018) have found that difficulties, although often avoided by learners, can facilitate the retention and flexible application of knowledge and skills.
A recent seminar at the University of 欧美高清, titled “Educational Ease and Desirable Difficulties” aimed to explore this tension. Supported by (欧美高清 Branch) and organised by the in the 欧美高清 Institute of Education, the session brought together educational philosophers and practitioners to challenge assumptions and explore fundamental choices that educators make.
A Summary of the Presentations
The day opened with Dr Vijay Prajapati’s talk, Beyond ‘Desirable Difficulty’: The Difficulty of Designing Educational Challenge. Vijay critiqued the concept of difficulty as a variable to be measured or optimised. Instead, she argued that difficulty is a relational, emergent phenomenon arising from the unpredictable encounter between the learner, the content, and the context. As a practitioner, she advocated for a shift in how difficulties in education are perceived, emphasising the unpredictability of challenges. Students should learn from navigating these unforeseen obstacles.
Dr Nicola Robertson followed with a stimulating philosophical inquiry: Can we Reimagine Kierkegaard’s ‘Theory of Social Prudence’ as a Theory of academic Resilience? Nicola framed academic resilience not just as grit, but as the ability to navigate the complexities of context and history. Drawing on Kierkegaard, she argued that difficulty is inherent in education, and introduced his metaphor of aesthetic engagement as crop rotation – viewing experiences in new lights in order to stay engaged and stimulated – as well as specific techniques that arise from his work and which help with resourcefulness and creativity, including mood control and the ability to embrace arbitrariness.
In The Paradox of Simplification: Easy Enough to Be Difficult, PhD student Anta Afsana took inspiration from her research into Sufism to explain that ease can come at the cost of a lack of emotional engagement; what feels easier can also feel shallow. She also raised the example of a religious pilgrimage – something which gains significance and value only though its inherent challenge. While ease invites entry, Anta explained, difficulty deepens transformation.
After lunch, Dr Karsten Kenklies presented a talk titled S/he Who Speaks the Truth Lies: The Pedagogical Relevance of Uncertainty. Karsten critiqued the tendency of academic discourse to calcify into fixed positions to satisfy public demands for easy answers. He distinguished between scientia – knowledge as a fixed resource – and science (or Wissenschaft) as a way of obtaining knowledge. He argued that Higher Education must move away from epistemic colonisation and instead teach students to cope with uncertainty, framing pedagogy as a perspective of reflection rather than just the transmission of stable truths.
PhD student and school leader Gillian Marshall offered a powerful metaphor in her session, Challenge as a Pedagogical Battery: Relational Currents and the Flow of Learning. She described challenge as the ‘battery’ that powers the learning process based on her experiences in the education system. However, she noted that for this current to flow, educators should be aware of the ‘resistance’ caused by cultural, linguistic, and power-based challenges. The learner’s experience of this current—whether they perceive it as a motivation or a threat—depends heavily on their agency and the environment the educator designs.
Next, Dr David Lewin presented a talk on Designing Educational Friction. David started out by referring to the role of ease in user interface design and software development, pointing out the current norm of frictionless design around the world, and moving on to the implications of this for education. He argued that education is necessarily frictional, but friction is not necessarily educational, emphasising the need for thoughtful selection of activities.
PhD student Gebing Wang concluded the series of talks with her session, The Illusion of Ease: How Generative AI Impairs Learning by Resolving Cognitive Conflict. This moved the discussion onto the psychological foundations of learning. She introduced the issue of generative AI as highly pertinent to difficulty and ease in education. By reducing the cognitive conflicts that students experience during learning (for example, by providing simplified explanations), generative AI can reduce students’ motivation to modify their mental models, thereby hindering the integration and transformation of knowledge.
Next Steps
Overall, this seminar provided a rich and comprehensive exploration of the role of difficulties and ease across learning contexts. The content of the seminar ranged from teaching practices to philosophical theories, with a great deal in between. It was an opportunity for academics working with different theories and perspectives to come together and explore a common theme.
Researchers from the Advanced Pedagogical Theory research subtheme intend to continue this dialogue and to explore this issue further. Interested? Colleagues, students and other interested educators are very welcome to reach out to collaborate or find out more. And perhaps you will reflect on this issue in your own context: where have you found difficulties to be productive, and where is the notion of ease potentially problematic?
References
Biesta, G. J. (2001). How difficult should education be?. Educational Theory, 51(4), 385–400.
Bjork, R. A. (2018). Being suspicious of the sense of ease and undeterred by the sense of difficulty: Looking back at Schmidt and Bjork (1992). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 146–148.
Lewin, D. (2018). Toward a theory of pedagogical reduction: Selection, simplification, and generalization in an age of critical education. Educational Theory, 68, 495–512.
Metcalfe, J. (2017). Learning from errors. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 465–489.
Published 05/06/2026
Image -